What does The Lord of the Rings
really mean? Many people (including
myself) have asked that question and many more are asking it today. And although people have come up with
possible answers, nobody really knows what J. R. R. Tolkien was thinking when
he wrote the famous trilogy. Here are a
few ideas that I have come across.
Some people believe that The Lord of the Rings is a Christian allegory. J. R. R. Tolkien was a very religious Roman
Catholic so some of that Christianity may have leaked into his writing.
The character Gandalf appears as an old, wise wizard. Who is Gandalf really? When you look at Gandalf’s actions and doings
really closely, you see that Gandalf could be a symbol of Jesus Christ. Here’s the first piece of evidence: Gandalf was sent to Middle Earth by the
Valar, or gods and goddesses of Middle Earth, from the land of Valinor
just like Jesus was sent down to Earth by God.
Gandalf was sent to Middle Earth to save the people from evil
Sauron. Also like Jesus, Gandalf has
many names. I think the biggest piece of
evidence happens in the Mines of Moria.
Gandalf gives his life to saving his companions by fighting the
Balrog. Gandalf dies fighting the Balrog
but the Valar decide that his mission is not over. Gandalf is brought back to life more powerful
than before, not Gandalf the Grey but Gandalf the White, just like Jesus was
crucified on the cross and brought back to life.
Other characters (Aragorn, Frodo and Sam) have been
suggested as Jesus figures because of the role that they play but none as
convincing as Gandalf.
A very famous psychologist named
Carl Jung had a theory that we have these images in our mind that continue to
show up throughout many cultures that are called archetypes. These archetypes have also shown up in The
Lord of the Rings. For example, Gandalf
is the archetype for the spirit. Saroman
is Gandalf’s shadow figure. Gollum is
Frodo’s shadow figure.
There are many interpretations for
The Lord of the Rings. Which one is
right? Who knows, they might be all
right. Tolkien denied his works being an
allegory of anything, he wanted his readers to read them as a story not a
symbol of something. But still, he could
have put symbols and allegories into his books without knowing it.
No comments:
Post a Comment